Clean Cars Facts

Those who benefit most from unconstrained consumption of oil and gasoline are spreading a number of myths about clean car standards and electric vehicles.  These arguments rely on cherry-picked data and arguments that are one-sided, misleading, or just plain wrong.

Fortunately, we have facts to counter these clean car myths. Click through for more information on each fact.

The Economics of Electric Vehicles

The Electric Car Driving Experience

Environmental Attributes of Electric Vehicles

Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Safety: Coming Soon

Consumer Choice: Coming Soon 

Debunking the Koch-Funded Reports

When spreading these anti-EV talking points, commentators will often reference the same handful of reports and studies, most of which are linked connected to Koch and oil industry funding. Learn more about these reports, including who wrote and paid for them, and find links to the best rebuttals and debunkings below.

‘Short Circuit: The High Cost of Electric Vehicle Subsidies’ by Jonathan Lesser for the Manhattan Institute: This report is often cited to support obviously misleading claims that widespread adoption of electric cars would increase air pollution and have a negligible impact on the global climate.

‘Costly Subsides For the Rich’ by Wayne Winegarden for the Pacific Research Institute: This report is often cited to support misleading claims that the EV tax credit only benefits the rich, but it relies on outdated data and entirely ignores the significant role that leased vehicles play in the EV market.

AEA Poll on Electric Vehicle Subsidies by MWR Resources for the American Energy Alliance: This classic push poll purports to reveal voter sentiment about the environmental virtues and federal support of electric vehicles, and voter opinions on auto efficiency standards. However, it was commissioned by an oil industry-funded think tank run by a former Koch Industries lobbyist, and was conducted by a polling firm that includes Koch Industries and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers among its clients.

‘Economic Impacts of Eliminating the Manufacturers’ Cap on the Plug-In Electric Vehicle Tax Credit’ by NERA Economic Consulting for Flint Hills Resources: This study, commissioned by a subsidiary of Koch Industries and conducted by the firm that produced key reports defending the tobacco industry, is referenced to support macroeconomic arguments against lifting the cap of the EV tax credit.

The truth about electric vehicles (EVs)

Union of Concerned Scientists’ on Electric Vehicles: The UCS notes that widespread adoption of EVs could save 1.5 million barrels of oil a day by 2035. They’ve got a number of useful tools and reports to consider the full emissions and environmental impacts, and to explain the electrification of the automotive fleet.

More EV myth-bashing: Media Matters has a useful resource that takes a hammer to number of EV myths, including many of those being used in the Koch vs. Electric Vehicles campaign.

The EV expert’s opinion: Rolang Hwang, Director of NRDC’s Energy and Transportation Program, regularly posts helpful and fact-based arguments on his blog.

EV reviews: Ready to take the plunge and buy or lease an EV? Or at least take one for a test drive? Green Car Reports has great “first drive” reviews, videos, buying guides, and all the information you need to consider what plug-in suits you best.